UPDATE: Some folks on REDDIT saw it in the store on Sunday (8/10) and were able to order and receive on Monday (8/11) and activate the camera. I had checked around 3pm CST on Monday and Best Buy did not have it listed. Your mileage may vary.
Says “delivery BY tomorrow” so … if you feel lucky . . .
Activation Warning
Folks who managed to get their hands on an X6 early reported they could not use it. Like much modern “smart” hardware, the camera is useless until it phones home and activates with the Insta360 server. There was a report of someone being able to activate and firmware update, so this may be what was in the latest Insta360 app update v2.31.1 which released yesterday.
On August 6, 2026, Insta360 seems to have allowed the preview videos for their new 360 camera to be posted. Some “reviewers” do up-front explain they were sent the hardware for free (which should be obvious; you cannot buy it yet), while others do not mention their video is sponsored with hardware. Of course.
Go to YouTube and take a look, but don’t expect too much yet. They seem quite limited to what they can say right now, and are unable to show any comparison videos — making the early release pretty pointless.
“Pro Tip” (again, there is no such thing unless your professional job really is giving tip): If a video does not tell you they got the gear for free, you may wish to skip their later “review.” If they are hiding the fact that they have been compensated with hardware, what else are they willing to hide? Also, be aware that if a “reviewer” who receives free hardware says bad things about that hardware, the company is less likely to send them more hardware in the future.
As you read this post, please keep in mind that, while I am an old fart when it comes to 360 photography (I have been experimenting with this stuff for over 20 years), I am still a relative newbie with Insta360.ย I have only been following Insta360 since 2021 when I began researching their ONE X2 360-degree camera. Back then, the Internet seemed to agree that the ONE X2 picture quality was worse than the RICOH Theta camera I already, had but you could do more “fun things” with it thanks to a more advanced app. In January 2022, I became an Insta360 owner. I speak with a whopping five years experience following the brand.
Although I missed the release cycle of the ONE X2, I did follow the announcements and releases for the subsequent X3, X4 and X5 models.
On August 3, Insta360 posted this recap of their camera evolution to YouTube:
A day later, they posted this announcement (teaser?) for their next camera – the Insta360 X6:
I am posting this with the hope that one of you will know much more about Insta360 than I do. This release feels different.
First, in the past, Insta360 would post a cryptic teaser with a date, and no specific information about what they were going to announce on that date. Here is how they teased the X5:
As you see, nowhere did they give us the product model “X5” — but since the video clearly showed 360-degree footage, “everyone” assumed this would be the followup to the X4 and that it would be called the X5.
Assumptions are not always correct.
It goes without saying that assumptions are seldom always correct. For example, when the X3 was released, “everyone” assumed it would be called the “ONE X3” because the previous two “X” cameras were the “ONE X” and “ONE X2“.
“everyone” was wrong.
It looks like Insta360 is changing things up yet again. This time, instead of a cryptic teaser with an announcement date, we got an actual video with the product name and a date – August 12, 2026. Many think this is when you will be able to buy the camera. But for the X5 release, the date in the teaser was when the product name and details would be announced, with the availability (i.e., “when can I buy it?”) happening shortly after.
The first time the name “X5” was announced, we were given all the details:
…but for this X6, we just get a teaser with the product name and a date, and no details.
If August 12th is the date you can buy it, what are you buying? Do folks really think Insta360 is really able to just say “hey, buy the new model on this date, without knowing anything about it.” Even Apple doesn’t do that, and that is a brand folks used to line up to buy before they figured out how to handle preorders ;-)
So perhaps, for 2026 and the X6, “shrinkflation” is just hitting marketing. Instead of a teaser giving an announcement date, then an announcement date with the name and details, followed by availability, we just get an announcement without details, and then will get the details on the day we get to place our order.
We shall see.
Even if the only improvement is better low light, that would be enough to make me interested in having one. I currently travel with a DJI Osmo 360 for low light, and the X5 for everything else.
As an early adopter of 360 photography, I have been enjoying the format for over twenty (20!) years. When I had RICHO Theta “one shot” 360 cameras, all reviews said they had superior image quality compared to the Insta360 ONE X era cameras. But I ended up getting an Insta360 ONE X2 anyway, once I saw all the cool things you could do with their app.
Being able to “do cool stuff” was more important than going less cool stuff that looked better. (IYKYK)
I remember being blown away by some of the things you could do with the Insta360 software. Ever see any demos of the “paper airplane” mode that lets you fly though things in an impossible way? If not, here is on from five years ago that demonstrates it right at the start, followed by an explanation on how it is done.
MIND BLOWING the first time you see something like that because “you can’t do that with a normal camera.”
The next mind blowing thing I saw was the older Bullet Time, which Insta360 introduced with their first Insta360 ONE camera, which I’d never even heard of until I was researching for this post. Here’s a promo about it:
And of course, Tiny Planet was really cool, too! It can create some weird photos (and videos):
But in the years that followed, a lot of the gimmicks just kind of disappeared. They were still there, in the app, waiting for newbies to play with them. They where like the 360 video version of the Star Wipe or Comic Sans – use them, and folks will make fun of you ;-)
But I still think they are neat.
Now that we have gotten used to things…
But now that we have gotten used to things, I seem to see the same tutorials over and over and over again. Fake drone shots by using a long selfie stick. Giant stepping over things by placing the camera low to the ground. Stuff flying or falling by mounting a leaf or paper airplane or whatever to the camera. Over and over and over. And all the big vloggers seem to have run out of things to tutor us on, as they inevitably post a new version of the same tutorial they showed us on last year’s camera model.
What will the next big video revolution be? For me, I still use my 360 camera mostly for preservation – capturing an area so someone can go back later and see “everything” — not just what I pointed my camera to. Did I walk by something that is now gone, and never take a photo of it or shoot video of it? 360 captured it — and even if not properly framed or lit, “crappy video is better than no video.”
My question for you is … do you ever seen these videos? Or do I only see them because I started following 360 “creators” and also sharing 360 video of my own? Or maybe you have seen the results of 360 video “reframed” down to a normal video, doing neat special effects you think took hours, but in reality it was just because they hit a button in an app using a 360 camera…
I do like Fly Lapse mode…
And doing a panning timelapse with a full stationary camera is cool…
And of course I like the Sky Replacement feature. Here is a clip from the Silver Dollar City’s Showboat in Branson, Missouri, with fake fireworks added with “one click” in the app.
You know, take back what I just wrote. I forgot how much fun these things are. But I think I have more fun making my own videos than looking at influencers do their version of something another influencer did, based on something an influencer did last year.
Whelp, the 360-degree camera rumor mill is running wild. Every since some registration paperwork was discovered about unannounced camera models, everyone is suddenly an expert on what the new models will be like – yet again.
Pro tip*: If you want to save some time, just block any influencer that is currently using photos showing fake images of hands holding the unreleased cameras, or boxes, or anything else. You can be assured these folks are not there to show truth – they are creating fake images for clicks. DO NOT TRUST.
You will then see your feed becomes much quieter.
Good luck, fakefluencers.
* There is nothing “professional” about a tip. Unless the person is a professional at giving tips, I guess…
When the Insta360 X4 came out, it upgraded the recording format from 5.7K to 8K — basically a 4K image for each of the two lenses. When folks tried to upload these files to YouTube, apparently early on 8K would appear as a choice.
Then something happened.
For the past few years I have seen this topic come up time and time again in 360 forums on Facebook, REDDIT, etc. Folks cannot get their videos to show in 8K. Up to 4K is all it offers:
Time and time again, folks in the forum that got it to work just say “sometimes it takes awhile before it shows up.” However, the majority of us seemed to NEVER see this as an option, even months (or a year) later.
Recently, I began investigating this again. I label all my 8K videos as “8K” and it felt misleading to do so if no one could watch them in 8K.
Then I learned: YouTube used a different size for 8K, or so various “experts” claimed. Even though the Insta360 8K size of 7680×3840 worked fine as 8K in the past (for some), apparently now you had to resize the video to 7680×4320 and then and only then would YouTube show it as 8K. At least, according to many folks who were trying to make the work. Here is part of a detailed series of posts on REDDIT about this:
My attempts to do this did not produce 8K. Meanwhile, others still insisted that 8K “just worked” when directly uploading the file exported from Insta360 Studio (and, I would assume, the same size file from the DJI desktop app for the DJI Osmo 360 camera).
But not for most of us.
Does it work for anyone?
I ran into a YouTuber that was posting some 360-degree videos from amusement parks, and noticed they labeled them as 8K in their thumbnails. Yet, no 8K option when I viewed it. This led to a few exchanges in the comments, and them saying they could even see my videos show 8K.
I guess that 7680×4320 suggested by some was not important, after all… even though that is the resolution YouTube specifically mentions for 8K:
When the experts disagree, you know we don’t really know what the rules are.
So why is it so many of us cannot see 8K, and others can see it just fine? I was today years old when I actually saw an 8K option or the very first time:
And, then I checked using a different browser on a different operating system (Edge on a Windows 11 machine) and saw it there, too.
Did something get flipped?
Please let me know if you can see an 8K option on the following video — and if you can (or can’t), tell us your browser and operating system. The PC I used was just a low end DELL with no special graphics card, and I am seeing it on an M2 Mac even though I just found a new post saying you needed an M3 or above to see them.
No one seems to know the rules. But one of you may, so let us all know. Thanks!
Yesterday my news alerts showed me a posting where someone shared screenshots of registrations for the Insta360 X6. There have been rumors of the X6 since (and maybe even before) the moment the X5 model was released.
Beyond adding higher resolution and/or better low light performance, what else would justify someone upgrading from the X5? Rumors are saying this model could have a 1″ lens — something Insta360 already had years ago with the Insta360 ONE RS. That model had 6K resolution (3K per lens) which was resolution worse than the later X4 and X5 “8K” models but the larger sense allowed it to capture better images even if at a lower resolution.
Just keep in mind — there is “what the camera can do” versus “what the camera operator can do.” Someone can take a mediocre camera, play with manual settings, and post-process the image to create something that looks much better than anything you can get from a “better” camera just by pressing the button in automatic mode.
I have mostly been a point-and-shoot user since I got my first digital camera in 1996, so “what the camera can do” is usually more important to me than what some advanced photographer can do with it.
An important reminder:
Be careful trusting an honest review if they don’t disclose they have a hardware sponsor providing them with hundreds or thousands of dollars worth of product to “review”. That, in itself, is dishonest, so how can you trust the rest?
Now we wait for hundreds of vloggers and bloggers to churn endlessly over the same rumors, adding nothing useful except regurgitation.
I first took “one shot” 360 photos in 2005 using a weird “half-mirror on a stick” thing called SurroundPhoto. It created images like this one, which were processed into 360 panorama QuickTime VR files:
360 Disneyland in 2005.
I later backed a kickstarter for a 3-lens device that was specifically designed for taking 360 photos (the failed 360cam). I’ve also owned a Kodak SP360, as well as several RICOH Theta cameras. The Thetas became my go-to camera due to their ease-of-use and form factor. My first Insta360 was the ONE X2, and that device is what switched me from RICOH to Insta360 cameras.
All this to say … I’ve been following and playing with this stuff for twenty years (and even longer if you consider the way we used to make 360 panoramas by taking a bunch of photos and stitching them together later with software). Here’s a 2002 example of photos I took specifically to make a 360 panorama out of using special software.
But I digress… since my 360 world has been Insta360 for several years (I’ve had the ONE X2, X3, X4 and now X5), YouTube has learned to show me lots of Insta360 YouTubers. Meanwhile, other camera manufacturers such as GoPro and DJI have their own set of YouTubers that I am completely unfamiliar with. I assume they are also “sponsored” and generally say good things about the gear they “review” just like the Insta360 reviewers do. My current pet peeve is the YouTubers who have hardware sponsors that provide them gear, then they lie to use and say they are unsponsored (this is illegal in the U.S.A. thanks to Federal Trade Commission rules that require disclosures).
But I digress…
Familiarity
Since I do not know the DJI YouTubers, I have no idea if I can trust what they tell me about the new DJI Osmo 360. Instead, many of us have been waiting to see what our Insta360 YouTubers say about it. After all, we are familiar with them and “trust” them because of it.
But can we?
If you are getting special perks from a company, such as free hardware, gift packages, and even being paid to make special tutorials from time to time, would you risk all of all that to tell us that a competing product is better? I cannot see why Insta360 would keep supporting content creators that promote another company’s product as being better.
With that said, I have found the Insta360 YouTubers take on the DJI Osmo 360 to be very interesting. I have also been watching the (unknown to me) DJI YouTubers discuss it, though since this is a new category for DJI, those videos have to explain the basics of what makes 360 video so cool to their audience that is likely unfamiliar. This makes the DJI videos a bit less useful for those of us that have been doing this stuff for years.
My ask of you…
Please leave a comment and share links to the “best’ DJI Osmo 360 review videos you have found. This can be dedicated videos, or comparison videos. I will share them here in a future post (or update this one).
BONUS: With the upcoming release of the GoPro Max 2 360 camera, I’d like to know similar GoPro channels that I should check out.
Every time I think I have figured out what Google Street View expects, I encounter a new problem. This time, I have a file that Google says has gaps in the GPS data:
But the problem is, I have already tried to fix this multiple times using tools like gpsbabel. This command line utility will create in-between points at the rate you specify. You can use a value of 1 second and get a point every second in the entire GPX file.
Using GPX Editor on the Mac lets me inspect the tracking points. If I sort by duration value, the longest value in the entire file is 4 seconds:
Yet, Google claims there is a 7 second gap after 9 seconds. Looking at the points in time order shows this is not the case: (But do note, this GPS starts sooner than the video; so the points I show here may be from time before the video begins. This does not change the issue, since there is nothing reported longer than 4 seconds in the entire file, anywhere.)
Anyone care to explain why this happens and how I can fix it? I have gotten every other file I have uploaded to work just fine, except for these two I have been working on since last week.
Even when I run gpsbabel with a 1 second “gap” between each point, I still get this type of error.
What else is Google looking for? Web searches and even chatting with Google’s Gemini A.I. have not produced anything helpful.
